| ??? 03/21/01 07:15 Read: times |
#10224 - RE: frequency |
Hi Peter,
That's exactly what I meant by saying "Anyway there are still ways to go around limitations in 8052 for making a good frequency counter." But the main concern here is the code. How you have done it in coding. Hints........ Simon |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 |



