| ??? 10/25/05 10:13 Read: times |
#102889 - eliminated Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Any really good optimizing compiler would reduce
for(x=0;x<33000;x++); to x=33000; if x was used afterwards. Otherwise it would be completely eliminated. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| passing parameters from c to assembly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RTFM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What Compiler? They are all differerent | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why assembly??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| some things can not be done in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes you can... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not true | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| eliminated | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bull! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| delay in C, yes ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| More on 'C' delay loops... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure, when you use a timer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Total Malund! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| dear Russell re "bull" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Malund Bull... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Public variable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Examples... | 01/01/70 00:00 |