Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
02/14/06 13:33
Read: times


 
#109942 - that is the reason NOT to use "bytewise"
Responding to: ???'s previous message
having extra internal EEPROM), which has 128-byte block but it's erasure happens transparently to the user, behaving as if it would be a completely bytewise-reprogrammable device (only with impact on "wearout" of the block, if bytes within it are "reprogrammed" often, one "full cycle" spent on "reprogramming" a single byte, requiring "smart" approach (write as many bytes at once as possible/needed) to reduce wear).
that is the reason NOT to use "bytewise-reprogrammable" chips.

With a traditional block erase, you can implement a "walking write" and thus make saveral writes per "endurance reduction".

for one of my projects, where I write 8 bytes to a ik sector, I gain a 128fold increase in lifetime by this.

Erik

List of 34 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
iap            01/01/70 00:00      
   Do you really care for our answers?            01/01/70 00:00      
      wasted time            01/01/70 00:00      
   no, all flash is block erase.            01/01/70 00:00      
   datasheet            01/01/70 00:00      
      manufacturer            01/01/70 00:00      
         please reply jan            01/01/70 00:00      
            AT89C51ED2            01/01/70 00:00      
               AT89C51ED2 EEPROM            01/01/70 00:00      
                  matter of how is it used            01/01/70 00:00      
                     For another Atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
                        difference            01/01/70 00:00      
                           you are right, not byte, but autoerase            01/01/70 00:00      
         that is the reason NOT to use "bytewise"            01/01/70 00:00      
            thankyou            01/01/70 00:00      
      Harshad. need your help            01/01/70 00:00      
         ask your problem here            01/01/70 00:00      
            ask on 8052.com            01/01/70 00:00      
            i am a new bee in this line            01/01/70 00:00      
               How about this forum?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  nitpicking            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Was that a pun?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        no, Kalpak            01/01/70 00:00      
                           A common mistake?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              I don't, a mistype            01/01/70 00:00      
   iap p89v51rd2            01/01/70 00:00      
      FCF not set properly            01/01/70 00:00      
   iap p89v51rd2            01/01/70 00:00      
      IAP            01/01/70 00:00      
   please help            01/01/70 00:00      
      elnec            01/01/70 00:00      
   It is, indeed, amazing            01/01/70 00:00      
      what is the relevancy?            01/01/70 00:00      
         youir post 14/Feb/06 6:07 am            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List