| ??? 04/10/06 16:11 Read: times |
#113992 - Quicker! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I said:
MOVX @Rn is quicker & more compact than MOVX @DPTR because you only use a single address byte. Kai Klaas said:
Quicker, are you sure? Made the same mistake... The actual external access cycle is no quicker. However, the code needed to set up the access is more compact (less to do - ony 1 address byte is used) and, therefore, quicker to execute. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| unclarity with movx instruction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Speed up | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Mistake | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Clarity prevails! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Quicker? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Quicker! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| assumption... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Finally, you are right! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MOVX @Ri | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| since you did not have the time to find | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| wrong answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Typo | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thanks Erik for the correction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It is set to P0 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| wrong again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes I am | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| an example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Internal XRAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not really | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ports' SFR are set to 1 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not a port, a "page SFR" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| P2? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Doh! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| which derivative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| do not allow? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AT89S8252 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Aaaaah, so. Thanks. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Tanks | 01/01/70 00:00 |