| ??? 05/12/06 22:13 Read: times |
#116145 - Context Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Mahmood Elnasser said:
So its not the same for Assembler In the context of this Thread it is the same! This thread is simply about writing to (and, presumably, reading from) EEPROM - in this context, it is the same for Assembler. ... Compiler takes care of details, while you have to understand the format and convert the number if you need to use it in Assembler. That's right - when you use it in assembler. But this thread is not about using the value - simply about storing data. So, back to your original comment, there is no need to do any sort of conversion just to store the value - not in assembler; not in 'C'. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| writing into internal EEPROM off AT89S82 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Writing to internal eeprom | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Partly wrong | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thanks Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| same for assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| IEEE 754 standard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Missing the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| same for assembler Not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Context | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "Keil" is not a swear word! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what is about | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'd make it generic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There's an echo in here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| General-purpose pointer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oleg | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thanks but still | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| still nobody knows what you want | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Back to basics | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AT89S8252 Primer | 01/01/70 00:00 |