??? 05/19/06 01:36 Read: times |
#116591 - Yup. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Correct, I'm using Keil's evaluation edition compiler. I've been playing around with SDCC but figured I'd give Keils IDE a shot.
Anyways, regarding the "why" of your post, I'm using reg420.h at the moment as I'm developing for a Dallas platform. I took a look at this header and it really didn't give me much syntax help. So that's the why. I went ahead and checked out reg52.h though and while P1 bits aren't totally defined, other ports are. Thanks for the heads up. Wish I had thought to look there earlier as it would have helped a lot. Oh well, learning is an uphill battle I suppose. |
Topic | Author | Date |
SFR has thoroughly confused me... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
bits and bytes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hmmm... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Always | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
does thyis make sense | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yup. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
of course it is![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sharpen them first | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ah ha! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
paper and file | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The best of both | 01/01/70 00:00 |