??? 06/21/06 12:29 Modified: 06/21/06 12:33 Read: times |
#118732 - then why not just do it the easy way Responding to: ???'s previous message |
It is one way protocol, because the sender are simple sensors
have all transmissions include a CRC and when receiving ANY transmission and a CRC check fail, throw it away. end of story Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Buffer management optimalization | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Simple things first ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You can use circular buffer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Fragmentation problem... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
all methods have some problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Start of package or End of package | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Packages explanation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Individual buffers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Good Idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
New packages | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
hash table unefective | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
why keep that many | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Reason of 5 or more buffer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Protocol specifics | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
One way protocol | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
One way protocol | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
never | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Definition of need | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Grant, I agree with what you post re thi | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Simply reason why one way transmission | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
then why not just do it the easy way![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |