??? 06/27/06 21:48 Read: times |
#119218 - what return??? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I said:
I'd like it [SP overflow exception] also as interrupt to be able to "fail gracefully Erik Malund said:
where would you store the interrupt return ? What return??? SP overflew, that means, SW failed. Time for BSOD*, or, better, core dump. The difference with present status quo is, now it fails in an unpredictible way. JW -------- * I wouldn't use BSOD to avoid getting sued by M$ - I bet they have patented that already :-) |
Topic | Author | Date |
best practice regarding SP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
an easier method | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the other way round | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
as a general rule | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Good rule | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
on stack and data | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Estimating stack usage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The future is now | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'd like it also as interrupt... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
where would you store the interrupt retu | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what return??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
then don't call it an interrupt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OK, call it... exception? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Trap perhaps? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
trap! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the root | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Fair point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
signaling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
avost?![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |