| ??? 07/07/06 13:33 Read: times |
#119811 - he did follow the instructions Responding to: ???'s previous message |
For the third time of asking, please follow the formatting instructions!
he did follow the instructions, the problem is that his code is very poorly formatted from the beginning. If you look you will see some indenting. Presenting formatted code by using pre and /pre only works when the code is formatted from the onset. This reminds me of the old anecdote about the man that went to the optometrist to get glasses so he could read. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| frequency of a digital pulse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Variable definitions ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Please post formatted code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Some points: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| misconceptions cleared | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| inappropiate response | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the entire problem again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| flag=!flag ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The value of Flag is known! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I see, but I don't C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's illogical, Captain... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It is worse than that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| nope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Please post formatted code!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| he did follow the instructions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh no he didn't! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Argument | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well, I saw the indentions and - shame | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| formatted code................. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thus therefore undefined | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Formatted, but not the same code! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 2 problems off the top | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a blatant understatement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Implicit casting mess. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| commentless code is worthless | 01/01/70 00:00 |