| ??? 07/18/06 22:37 Read: times |
#120528 - But then Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Steve M. Taylor said:
The 537 has gone obsolete, so Edward may be simply trying to move the code onto new hardware. So why does he need to do that by reading the binary from the chip and disassembling it? Surely, if it were just an update to an existing design like that, he'd have the necessary sources? And if he doesn't, he should know enough about his product to start again from scratch - which is probably more useful than trying to decompile the old one? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Anyone interested in a 80C537 bounty? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Additional Requirements | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Obsolete ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Reverse engineering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a 'legal' example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, legal but ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But then | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I once was that layman | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| weird | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I never said it was illegal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
and I am curious | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| to whomever may be interested | 01/01/70 00:00 |