| ??? 05/31/01 13:36 Read: times |
#12070 - RE: Phase angle, Duty Cycle |
With a steady-state sinewave, a 180-degree phase shift is indistinguishable from a polarity inversion (or "complement"); therefore lots of people make the (false) assumption that "180-degree phase shift" and "polarity inversion" are synonymous.
A signal with a duty cycle not equal to 50% is an excellent illustration of the why a "180-degree phase shift" and a "polarity inversion" are not synonymous! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Phase angle, Duty Cycle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Phase angle, Duty Cycle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Phase angle, Duty Cycle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Phase angle, Duty Cycle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Phase angle, Duty Cycle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Phase angle, Duty Cycle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Phase angle, Duty Cycle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Phase angle, Duty Cycle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Phase angle, Duty Cycle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Phase angle, Duty Cycle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Phase angle, Duty Cycle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Phase angle, Duty Cycle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Phase angle, Duty Cycle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Phase angle, Duty Cycle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Phase angle, Duty Cycle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Phase angle, Duty Cycle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Phase angle, Duty Cycle | 01/01/70 00:00 |



