??? 08/07/06 16:09 Read: times |
#121796 - HUH? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Once again weve got people picking holes in the code and the op being none the wiser
Is "for reliable timing you must code in asm" not "wisdom"? I posted, with no response (yet) "Once Ashwin present a fundamentally currect delay routine ..." so the wait for the OP is on. The point is that if the OP persist in doing so called timing in C, he will never get anywhere. Jez, please do not start the discussion from a month ago "should we help posters do the wrong thing" again. Erik |