| ??? 08/25/06 08:37 Read: times |
#122993 - Protection bits Responding to: ???'s previous message |
All this reverse engineering is unnecessary if the protection bit wasn't programmed. The programming state can be read back (for verification), so I'd stick it in a PAL programmer first. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| PAL - Readable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I hope not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| feedback | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no flip-flops in the 16R8 - if I recall | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| aha | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You've been misinformed ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no, he has not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well then, he was UNINTENTIONALLY misinformed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You can do it! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Protection bits | 01/01/70 00:00 |