| ??? 08/26/06 19:24 Read: times |
#123109 - Sorry Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi The,
I'm sorry, but it looks to me exactly as it looks to you. It seems that your code (which is to say the automatically generated code) is reserving a single byte of STACK space in the indirectly addressable memory space. It doesn't matter if the number is treated as binary, decimal, octal, hexadecimal or anything else. A one is a one. And no, if I were writing the code I would not reserve only one byte of STACK space. All I can guess is that there is some consideration that neither you nor I know about. Hopefully someone who understands what's going on here will contribute to this thread. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| What does this mean? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not Equal To | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not Equal to | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Manual. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not Equal to | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SP and STACK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Stack | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sorry | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Stack of names and STACK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| notation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Stack | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes and no and no | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Stack | 01/01/70 00:00 |