| ??? 06/23/01 21:02 Read: times |
#12735 - RE: Fat (32) system(s) |
Why FAT32? If you think it sounds "extensive", why not FAT16? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Fat (32) system(s) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Fat (32) system(s) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Fat (32) system(s) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Fat (32) system(s) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Fat (32) system(s) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Fat (32) system(s) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Fat (32) system(s) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Fat (32) system(s) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Fat (32) system(s) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Fat (32) system(s) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Fat (32) system(s) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Fat (32) system(s) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Erik Andersson | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Andy Neil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Lance Robinson | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Mp3Player | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Mp3Player | 01/01/70 00:00 |



