Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
11/10/06 21:49
Read: times


 
#127746 - part # avoidance
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Erik Malund said:
The 660/662/664 (for some reason they avoided '666' :)


Wimps.

-a

PS: back in the day, I found a number of uses for the 74xxx666 (.pdf) device.






List of 15 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
crazy NXP web            01/01/70 00:00      
   I tried, anyhow            01/01/70 00:00      
      thanks            01/01/70 00:00      
         have you noticed            01/01/70 00:00      
            certainly            01/01/70 00:00      
            Intersil            01/01/70 00:00      
   P89C66x, isn't it obsolete?            01/01/70 00:00      
      not quite            01/01/70 00:00      
         part # avoidance            01/01/70 00:00      
            P89C66x EOL            01/01/70 00:00      
      it might be            01/01/70 00:00      
   This?            01/01/70 00:00      
      more-less, yes            01/01/70 00:00      
   the story as I know it            01/01/70 00:00      
      web users comitee?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List