| ??? 12/12/06 14:58 Read: times |
#129345 - I agree and, in addition Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I agree with Jan, "Throw away the simulator - it might be flawed in some way", but in addition It is, indeed possible that the simulator works. I had a glance at the code and, due to missing COMMENTS and missing routines e.g. I2C_START I could determine nothing.
Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| I2C Read Operation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Photo | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| get the real stuff | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I agree and, in addition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks for all Replies, But... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| By the way... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DELAY time is required ,I guess | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| EEPROM needs time to write | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what is it you do not understand | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what is it you do not understand | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I will not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
True | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| simulator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What addressing you are using | 01/01/70 00:00 |