| ??? 01/28/07 08:45 Read: times |
#131617 - That's not what Jan said Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Sriram Sridharan said:
Why do we need the address of the 1st instruction for the start and stop bit. That's not what Jan said: Jan Waclawek said:
In most '51 assemblers, $ stands for "address of first byte of this instruction". It's the 1st byte of the current instruction - not the address of the 1st instruction! And it doesn't have anything specifically to do with the start or stop bit; it's a delay loop - see: http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=131616 |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Bitbanging help needed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Because they mistyped $ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| or use assembler with different syntax | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: Because they mistyped $ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's not what Jan said | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The bit banging file | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Bitbanging | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| They are timing loops | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| they used * for a reason | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE:Bit banging help | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Code for bitbanging(Modified) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| testing two unknowns | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A hint | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another hint | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Simulate! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
cross posted | 01/01/70 00:00 |