| ??? 03/01/07 11:46 Read: times |
#134010 - Another case where the comment is harmful :-( Responding to: ???'s previous message |
The table was originally 14 bytes long, but was later changed to add an extra parameter.
My bad :-O Rob. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Writing to flash from firmware | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| pretty sure the problem is in the erase section... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that's another thing ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this is the case when the comment IS harmful.. :-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| need some sleep? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| haha, yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Key sequence | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks rob | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "hung up"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 14 bytes or 15? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another case where the comment is harmful :-( | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| More suggestions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| random thought | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: random thought | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What I mean by hung up | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| since I do not use this deviate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the vdd monitor? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how you determine? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| In response to Oleg's question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| seen this app note? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| problem solved... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| are you using LARGE? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no large or xdata var | 01/01/70 00:00 |



