??? 04/10/07 20:56 Modified: 04/10/07 20:58 Read: times |
#136942 - a recommendation and a question Responding to: ???'s previous message |
the below is 'code sketches', should get you going
1) do not code both serials first time, get one going 2) some of the derivatives with two serials are 'strange' which one do you use 3) No need to start a new thread, but stay here, Steve or Craig will delete the original, I hope. 4) an embedded processor do not return from main() you need to stay there void main() { // initialize ... // workloop for(;;) { .... } } the 'standard way to send data w/o interrupts is while (more_data_to_output) { while (!TI); SBUF = next_character; } in an ISR it will be if (TI) { SBUF = next_character; }Erik ps if "Herr Malund" is a snicker, I am sorry I helped you, if it is extreme politeness, there is no need for that, I sign 'Erik' |
Topic | Author | Date |
"Newbie's" etc with indents | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
a recommendation and a question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
am I missing something? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: missing something? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: recc's and question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
glossary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
"bible" time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Where is the Interupt Handler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: handler location | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: actual handler location | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Status update | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
that is problematic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: Problematic. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
just spotted this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: Interrupt number | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if you do like this (http://....) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: interrupt *solution*![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |