??? 04/19/07 18:42 Read: times |
#137552 - Not necessarily. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jez Smith said:
... the irda specification is horrible the protocol stack is huge and highly complex . "IRDA" covers a whole multitude of protocols for various different applications. There is a simple protocol (SIR?) for low-speed, UART-like comms that is perfectly appropriate to 8051s: basically a pulse of IR indicates a '0'; no pulse indicates '1' There are some chips that do a direct conversion from UART output to this kind of IRDA - maybe the tfds4500 is one such? (if the OP posts a datasheet link, we could check it and see). Maxim has some application notes about it. It's been discussed before - which is why the original thread scored a massive -4 for "Didn't search first"!! Must be some kind of a record... |
Topic | Author | Date |
tfds4500 irda transceiver | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sure, show what you have | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Step One | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It is possible to use irda but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not necessarily. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
search | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
good, what about a link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That's good | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Datasheets | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Datasheets | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SIR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
level converter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Direct![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |