??? 04/30/07 15:56 Read: times |
#138316 - is nothing but sales babble Responding to: ???'s previous message |
http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads...61102b.pdf
Is nothing but sales babble There is nothing there you can not find in a modern '51. Of course, if you want to promote your PIG by comparing it to ancient '51 derivatives, you can always 'win'. A "software programmable WDT" is the equivalent of no WD. If YOU can program it, so can runaway code. NOW, where in the PIC is the PLL allowing you a slower oscillator with the same internal clock speed, which, is the most effective "EMI reducer I have seen. MCU's susceptiblity to EMI environments. like PIC has a robust architecture for ESD events on their pins. I see NOTHING about that, except a "broad sales driven statement" all I read about is about emissions. If a puppy is 'ESD ptotection', then the moon is made of green cheese. I have nothing, per say, agains PIC, but claiming, based on this link, that they are 'better' is ridiculous. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
MCU Core performance stability atmels | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Unanswerable! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No perceivable difference | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
stability ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
perhaps he means..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I thought that was PCs? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
EMI environments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
please elaborate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Microchip documents them -no | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
is nothing but sales babble | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
PIC Perception | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
broad sales driven statement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what 'issues'? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Atmegas | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Looking Inside? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you don't? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
able to keep up | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
and so is NXP![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Atmegas | 01/01/70 00:00 |