Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
05/19/07 17:11
Read: times


 		 #139530 - well, does it not?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
If you guys want to argue about off-chip resources, go ahead. It won't help speed up anyone's code, though.
Are you saying that you can not write (in)efficient code for accessing external resources?

The thread is "How to speed code?" NOT "how to use internal resources effciently".

As a matter of fact I once had a thingy with two of the battery backed Dallas NVRAMS one was the bootloader with the reaminder free, the other was the app which used the space above the bootloader as XDATA. To boot, switch the two memories, to run, switch back.

Erik



List of 43 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
How to speed code?            01/01/70 00:00      
   How did you come to that bizarre idea...            01/01/70 00:00      
      bizarre!?            01/01/70 00:00      
         I am a C-hater, remember...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Smaller, Faster            01/01/70 00:00      
   Is that true??            01/01/70 00:00      
   Often mutually exclusive...            01/01/70 00:00      
   Take my contribution with a grain of salt.            01/01/70 00:00      
      http://www.8052.com/users/disasm/            01/01/70 00:00      
   what compiler?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Data types            01/01/70 00:00      
   Getting the least            01/01/70 00:00      
   My Two Cents            01/01/70 00:00      
      Turn in your Programmer's ID Card.            01/01/70 00:00      
         heheh...yeah            01/01/70 00:00      
         SJMP            01/01/70 00:00      
   Comments            01/01/70 00:00      
   How to speed code?            01/01/70 00:00      
   a couple of \'rules\'            01/01/70 00:00      
      More on Erik's Rules            01/01/70 00:00      
         a comment            01/01/70 00:00      
         PDATA            01/01/70 00:00      
            don't forget about @DPTR access to CDATA            01/01/70 00:00      
               but            01/01/70 00:00      
                  WHAT??? You mean I have it too? Dystypia?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Enginnering is all about the tradeoffs            01/01/70 00:00      
                        two places where you REALLY can make an impact            01/01/70 00:00      
                           b) buffer at 256 byte boundary            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Alignment            01/01/70 00:00      
                              you did'nt hear ?            01/01/70 00:00      
               Another \"but\"            01/01/70 00:00      
                  it is, after all, quicker            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Errr...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        perhaps, but it has to "live" somewhere.            01/01/70 00:00      
                           You\'re assuming...            01/01/70 00:00      
                              confirming Andys statement            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 We WERE discusisng 805x ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    well, does it not?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Tables in code space vs data space            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Philps XA, the best "16 bit '51"            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Maxim/Dallas DS89C450            01/01/70 00:00      
   most compilers            01/01/70 00:00      
      Thanks            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List