??? 06/19/07 06:34 Read: times |
#140976 - The difference Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Asif's is not wrong, however, I understand what Robert Henneke tried to tell. The difference between using the Henneke's and Asif's version is that at the end of each table, Asif's version uses AJMP AGAIN, while Henneke's version simply uses RET (I personally like Henneke's version). And don't use POP to retrieve values from stack saved by CALL unless you want to do something weird, use RET instead (read the literature if you haven't). |
Topic | Author | Date |
How to branch through table, without CJNE ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You are very close | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Oh Thanks sir, :-) you are really great, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
WoW sir it really worked:-) here is full code, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not quite | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: Abbreviations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Some remarks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Some Corrected Remarks :-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The difference | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
other type of table, XOR instead CJNE ;-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Rotate![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |