??? 06/29/07 04:42 Modified: 06/29/07 05:23 Read: times |
#141330 - Needs a bit more error checking Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Pretty neat except needs a little bit more error checking. Otherwise it doesn't catch invalid characters in the range ':' through '@'. Maybe something like the following???
-- Russ ![]() |
Topic | Author | Date |
number in ascii to binary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not sure if this will help but anyways | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Basic method | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Needs a bit more error checking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A Different Solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thank you![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |