??? 07/10/07 06:54 Read: times |
#141668 - So why did they do that? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
John Hu said:
I found out after removing all the _at_ All what _at_? You haven't shown any _at_ in this thread If you're going to cross-post, be sure to include a link so that everyone can follow the full discussion, and get the full story! See: http://www.keil.com/forum/docs/thread10183.asp So why did the original author use all those _at_ in the first place? You really need to find that out before you just remove them...! (Hopefully, as noted in the other thread, they really are just pointless - but you need to be 101% sure of that before you just throw them out!) |
Topic | Author | Date |
data declaration problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Look at the Map file! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
hmm... how? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Think about it - nothing weird! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
So why did they do that? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks andy~ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
advice on the usage of absolute addresses | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
so how do i check? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It should be documented! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
i see | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
incomplete | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Pay attention! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
to what? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Jojo's back | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
please read the content in that link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
gaps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ya... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
read my post above ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I got it now | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How to make a gap![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not a declaration problem! | 01/01/70 00:00 |