| ??? 08/16/07 13:53 Read: times |
#143344 - CRC8 instead of CR32 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Yes you are right. I somehow always had CRC32 in mind which is overkill for a 8051. But the CRC8 really seems like an option than.
For my current project the simple summing checksum will do. Maybe I have to discuss with my professor if a more elaborated checksumming scheme is better. The XOR scheme you have described seems simple and easy to implement as well. Actually a sort of combination of my original idea. thanks, Matthias |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Simple EEPROM checksumming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pitfalls | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a checksum out of 2 bytes? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's an "either - or" ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| code sketch | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a simple checksum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CRC8 instead of CR32 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I am talking about CRC-16 not CRC-8 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| oups | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how much data? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| approx 40-60 bytes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I use 2 copies and a counter for that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| adding to Jan's post | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Here's one method | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| another interesting scheme! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try the Dallas 1-wire CRC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| another good idea but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I just meant the CRC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
oups | 01/01/70 00:00 |