| ??? 11/29/07 16:01 Read: times |
#147571 - of course it does Responding to: ???'s previous message |
On removing the code const keywords the compiler compiles the code but the problem arises
there is hardly enough space to hav that much in the 128 byte DATA space. If you want it modifiable (why) replace code const with xdata but if you leave the code keyword you will not lose precious xdata space. Placing it in xdata will not save you code space, the compiler need the values in code memory to initialize an xdata array.. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Dallas DS89C450 - placing a large array into xram | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| of course it does | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OP is using large memory model | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yep - I'm using the large memory model | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| large memory model and timing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'm using the XRAM inside the DS89C450 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Do Not Forget pdata | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'll look into this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Divide and conquer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks - I will try this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| one other thing ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You're welcome | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| We've fixed it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's been a while... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks - That's fixed it! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks for your help | 01/01/70 00:00 |