??? 03/31/08 08:46 Read: times |
#152737 - Two things need explaining Responding to: ???'s previous message |
1. Why are you attempting this?
Knowing why will help people to give appropriate replies; It may also enable people to suggest better ways to achieve the same thing. 2. How are you currently doing it? From your post, it seems that your current approach is not working as you expected - yes? It is impossible to guess what might be wrong with your code (or your expectations) without actually seeing your code - properly explained, with comments. See: http://www.8052.com/faqs.phtml?FAQ=120199 |
Topic | Author | Date |
call routine problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
call routine | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what do you mean by "come out"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
call routine | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Does not ignore RET but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Good implementation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
one of the reasons might be... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
call routine | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
please explain... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Two things need explaining | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Processor doesn't just ignore instructions! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I guess ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
call routine | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
use sjmp ljmp ajmp![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |