| ??? 05/06/08 05:53 Read: times |
#154462 - What would be the point? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
As Russ has already pointed out, they all require the yse of Assembler.
So, to implement any of them, you would first have to choose the correct assembler for the particular processor. But, if you know which assembler to choose, then you must already know which processot it is, mustn't you? And, if you already know which processot it is, you must also know its word size! So it's all a bit pointless! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| find the size of processor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C is not that portable! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thanks but could u clarify | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I think you missed the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Various compilers different results | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Word size - not code size? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| u r correct | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Determining object sizes - at run time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not quite | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Correct ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not sure what you would do with the information | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This was an interview question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| More trick interview questions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I found the solution, Andy , Neil please comment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Great! Now do it in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Same logic for C and asm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, it isn't. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What would be the point? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It is worse than that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the whole question is silly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It can even get this silly... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It is an interview question | 01/01/70 00:00 |