| ??? 05/20/08 06:27 Read: times |
#154945 - 64 or 128 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I did not see any evidence that Raj was actually trying to use a 128 byte chunk of RAM for two arrays. Instead he was talking about a 64 or 65 byte setup and then it sounded like he was breaking up the one string into two shorter arrays to see if the problem was a compiler limit for 64 bytes in a single string array.
Michael Karas |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Array size limitation for Keil ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if you breakpoint | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Time to check the assembler output.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: you can not break on the declaration of a vari | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you can not break on the declaration of a variable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You seem to be declaring constant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It is fully possible.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| idata as stack | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil compiler limits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I agree - its not a limit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well maybe.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 64 or 128 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It was the stack | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The compiler cannot really guess .. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Glad you have it working | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Map the variables in correct memory area | 01/01/70 00:00 |