| ??? 05/23/08 14:03 Read: times |
#155060 - the curse of the PC programmers Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I don't recall ever actually needing or using these on a '51, but I suppose it might make sense under certain unusual circumstances.
the curse of the PC programmers that believe that programming a '51 is "just writing some C code" has forced the compiler makers to, for competitive reaons, include stuff, the implementation of which on a '51, is totally 'destructive' such as malloc() Erik I recall a case of PC programmers that believe that programming a '51 is "just writing some C code" where I was asked to help with code banking because the program did not fit in 64k, I kicked the idiots out and ended with < 8k of code and a functioning design |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| keyword volatile | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Opposite! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| volatile modifier | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Incorrect | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| incorrect! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| even more | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A heap o' trouble | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the curse of the PC programmers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| meaning of "volatile" with example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| gobbelygook | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| heap? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Confused? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Google told me... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| go through my explanation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| put simply... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| answer accepted by interviewer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not entirely | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not input only | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That's the kind of thing I'd be looking for... | 01/01/70 00:00 |