| ??? 06/02/08 19:38 Read: times |
#155416 - I know, I have been missing that Responding to: ???'s previous message |
You are right of course, but that damned data sheet having an Erase Block command listed made me overlook that good advice and focus on the erase. Not requiring an erase is great, but believing that someone actually made something easier is difficult.
|
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Now I can't get "Erase Block" to work, 89C51RC2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PLEASE, pretty please | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Atmel 89C51RC2-UM Erase Block | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if there is no prefix on the chip... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FLIP says it is an AT89C51RC2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh, everybody remembers all previous posts, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well I remember all of yours! :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why wouldn't be that? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Have I misinterpreted the documentation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| WHICH documentation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| BAD documentation! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| oh, THAT one IS bad indeed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'd say this the reason why erase does not work... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No erase is needed, why did I think it was? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but, Gary, we HAVE been talking about it... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I know, I have been missing that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| when I came accross IAP for the first time... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not How - but the Before/After | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Run In Simulation | 01/01/70 00:00 |