Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/18/08 23:39
Read: times


 
#156020 - re: stay away from Sparkfun
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Erik Malund said:
these guys actually SELL circuitry that is proven not to work (OK, I have heard that this occasionally works with certain PCs)

http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/...cts_id=133

click on the schematic.

I stumbled over this in another forum where a sucker had actually paid money for it.

We have seen a lot of 'working' designs offered for free, but selling it takes the cake.

The ultimate irony is that had they made a fully fiunctional circuit (with a MAX232[equivalent]) it would have cost them no or little more.

Erik


I'm inclined to agree with Erik. First of all you can find a lot of their products elsewhere for less money.

But it seems like their tech support is worthless and they're just hacks.

I bought one of their small touchscreen GLCDs and their "CFAX GLCD Carrier board" And it has an obvious stupid bug that should have been caught. Here is the exact e-mail I sent to their tech support, and I should note that they never replied.

Me, to Sparkfun said:
I've got the CFAX graphic LCD carrier board (SKU#: LCD-00463) and it's got issues.

The schematic is dated 5/27/2007, but the PCB I have (I received it last month) is noted as V2 and is dated 10/31/2006 (and that matches the pinout).

The schematic has a net called VCC_BL at the node where the positive terminal of C5 meets the inductor. That net doesn't connect to anything else, and page 3 of the HV826 datasheet (http://www.supertex.com/pdf/datasheets/HV826.pdf) indicates that this node should be connected to the input supply. Someone at Spark Fun might want to test these things before shipping them ...

Also: the schematic shows three boxes labeled SL1, SL2 and SL3 but nothing on the board matches these things.

Also also: you paid for the top-layer silkscreen, so why not put reference designators near the components? And maybe include in the silkscreen the net names for the line of microcontroller connections?

Also also: the touchscreen connections are listed as TS1 through TS4. How about calling them X+, X-, Y+ and Y-? And which is which, anyways?

Finally: bringing out the LCD's CS1B and CS2 lines to the unused breakout holes between D4 and D5, and D6 and D7, is useful.


For what they charge, their shit should work.

-a

List of 4 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Stay away from sparkfun it is no fun            01/01/70 00:00      
   re: stay away from Sparkfun            01/01/70 00:00      
      I have to agree ... it looks pretty silly ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         I agree with eric, but...            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List