| ??? 06/20/08 10:58 Modified: 06/20/08 11:01 Read: times |
#156064 - ??? and a misunderstanding Responding to: ???'s previous message |
INT1 since INT0 is in use for the I2C hardware
???? The problem i've run into is that the arbitration is number 7 for INT1 and I2C is number 5 which is higher priority. A very common misunderstanding the interrupt numbers are only relevant if the interrupts happen in the same clock cycle (the word in the datasheet is "simultaneous") the only way to make an interrupt interrupt an interrupt is by the IP SFR. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Interrupt arbitration hardware issue/question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ??? and a misunderstanding | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ok, I do recall, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Never Mind I figured it out | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
when in doubt, leave the pins in quasi | 01/01/70 00:00 |