| ??? 08/04/08 20:32 Read: times |
#157258 - Only very roughly indeed... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jan Waclawek said:
... roughly said, most of the semiconductor manufacturers use the subsequent scheme (example is your 1.) Only very loosely - remember, there is absolutely no formal standardisation whatsoever. 1. prefix, denoting manufacturer1 - P is for Philips That is to say, Philips have taken their initial 'P' to use as a prefix on their part numbers - this does not mean that you can assume that any part number beginning with 'P' is a Philips part. Of course, Philips is now NXP - but they continue to use 'P' in their part numbers. There are plenty of other such "anomolies" of historical origin; eg, "MC..." parts from Freescale... |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Full meaning of IC numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| google device + data sheet and start READING | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Device-specific | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| an example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OOPS, saw one 'I' too many | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| all of what has been said, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Only very roughly indeed... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Looking For Fortues in Tea Leaves? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Can you give an example? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| P and D | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I believe packaging was designated in the suffix | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I will have to look | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| D87C51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
There may be a reason for this | 01/01/70 00:00 |