| ??? 09/06/08 13:18 Read: times |
#158002 - If you knew that.................. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
That is why I opted to stop the timer using CLR TR0 and than reload timer and start it again.So I get the required time delay.
Hello Nimish, If you knew that before then why were you asking "why should i CLR TR0,load values and SETB TR0" ? Check the last sentence of your first post in this thread You should Thank Per Westermark for giving a good explanation. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Auto reload | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| See any potential problems? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Enable interrupts last | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this may, some day, bite you in your lagest muscle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| also may, some day, bite you in your lagest muscle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CALL or JMP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| good catch | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
find out | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Remember the update | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So, what the final answer ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| diplomatic answer - OK and the direct too | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| care with multi-read/multi-write of running timers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re:problem with updating a 16-bit counter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you knew that.................. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE:If you knew that.................. | 01/01/70 00:00 |