??? 09/11/08 19:07 Read: times |
#158203 - 5 to 6% accuracy Responding to: ???'s previous message |
In fact, we consistently achieve 5-6 percent accuracy for a given load for RMS current measurement (of course, the slow response factor works in favour), discounting the linearity issues, which we correct with a look-up table. Look up table is again, not that complicated, since we do the tabling using a windows software, where response graph can also be input which is then straightened out with the table. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Energy meter chips for non-energy meter applicatio | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not necessarily | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
2 chips... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RS-485 is the answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SPI is available | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How much filtering? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
15 cycles is fine!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
5 to 6% accuracy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
5 to 6% accuracy ??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Accuracy![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
APFC not APF | 01/01/70 00:00 |