Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
11/03/08 22:35
Read: times


 		 #159598 - in order to keep things together
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Andy Neil said:
Ah - now, if it were properly structured as a separate function, that shouldn't be such a problem - but why bother with inlining it if you've gone to all the trouble of making it a function anyhow?

I can use the very same argument: why bother with creating a separate file and go through all the oddities of linking it together with the C part?

Andy Neil said:
No, the usual "reason" for requesting inline assembler is just to sprinkle the odd assembler instruction or two randomly in the 'C' source to fiddle directly with hardware registers, the Stack Pointer, or somesuch.

I see no indication in the original post that this was the intention. Nor do I remember a post requiring this - but I admit I am not member of this Forum for that long time as others here may be.

Couldn't we simply presume innocence and provide information?

JW


List of 48 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Asm and C            01/01/70 00:00      
   Depends!            01/01/70 00:00      
      Also            01/01/70 00:00      
         No! Not Inline!!            01/01/70 00:00      
            why not inline?            01/01/70 00:00      
               I agree with Andy (at least for Keil), but ....            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Keil specifically            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Keil and reasoning            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Jan...Take it from experience...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           can you please explain?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Example??            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 I am curious            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Use these references in lieu of examples:            01/01/70 00:00      
                              I explained it earlier; example here            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 I now see the point with Keil...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Often intrinsic use of inline assembler            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Not a safe assumption?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          No, extrapolation not allowed            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          but if it is a macro...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             A limited example            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                an opinion            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Keil specifically - more            01/01/70 00:00      
               Why Not inline C            01/01/70 00:00      
               Inline assembler - Avoid! Avoid!!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  in order to keep things together            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I do            01/01/70 00:00      
                        from where I sit...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           you said it            01/01/70 00:00      
                              this has nothing to do with it            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 asm *functions* embedded in C-majority source file            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Whay Not???            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    My view point on ASM in C            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       That is the point            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 here is one - at least re Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Maybe not here, but...            01/01/70 00:00      
            I do not disagree            01/01/70 00:00      
   Compiler ?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Get the manual when/where you get the compiler            01/01/70 00:00      
   and C in asm ?            01/01/70 00:00      
      C first?            01/01/70 00:00      
         not used to call compiler generated asm so translate by hand            01/01/70 00:00      
      if a compiler can do it            01/01/70 00:00      
      depends on the compiler            01/01/70 00:00      
         SDCC...            01/01/70 00:00      
            What assembler?            01/01/70 00:00      
               SB-asm            01/01/70 00:00      
                  In principle this should work.            01/01/70 00:00      
                  OTOH, why not simply write in ASM?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List