| ??? 04/28/09 14:50 Read: times |
#164907 - What unwanted comments? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Amit Mittal said:
[...] the whole thing is that give suggestion without any unwanted comments.
So mention these unwanted comments. And what is wrong with the syntax? By the way - most web forums don't spend time picking on syntax because of the varying background of all posters. Complaints about language is normally limited to 1337-speech and SMS abreviations where the poster more or less intentionally makes it hard for other people to read the text. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| header file for at89s52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What compiler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| consider it, Mr. Neil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The more specific original q, the more specific answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| before deciding Andy was 'rude', did you ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| to those who replied to me | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What unwanted comments? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| see this line for "unwanted comment" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It means just that - nothing magic or special about it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It means exactly what it says | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thank you sir for your help | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| state, at least, ONE case of ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| check out the differences between 8052 and 'S52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thank you Mr.Jan Waclawek for this information | 01/01/70 00:00 |