| ??? 06/21/09 18:59 Read: times |
#166315 - doesn't SDCC warn about line 36? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
there is a lot to say about your code but
why should xmt_flag be tested for not being zero in line 36 if its value is known zero?
_uart_send:
mov _SBUF,dpl
; uart.c:31: xmt_flag = 0;
clr a
mov _xmt_flag,a
mov (_xmt_flag + 1),a
; uart.c:34: while (1)
00105$:
; uart.c:39: opti_fooler++;
inc _opti_fooler
clr a
cjne a,_opti_fooler,00105$
inc (_opti_fooler + 1)
sjmp 00105$
Hint: lookup "volatile", then recheck, then remove the variable:) |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| UART code porting to SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| doesn't SDCC warn about line 36? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that's it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ah ha | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Don't blame the optimiser! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| doesn't SDCC warn about line 36 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hmmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
modified dog | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I cannot remember now | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| xmt_flag., why "int"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if you want to use it as "int" / "char" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You destroy succeding putchar()'s | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "Volatile" Helps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "bit" is more useful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| buzzzzz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| family | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| stdbool | 01/01/70 00:00 |