| ??? 08/05/09 10:18 Read: times |
#168173 - Hardware handshake Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I think a certain amount of latency is always to be expected on any implementatation? Sure, But my point is that the CTS latency occurs regardless of the transfer size, as I mentioned in above post. Also, it doesn't concern to the PC clock speed nor PC device driver - it's hardware handshake, which is handled on the chip by hardware. Data drop occurs when firmware programmer doesn't count in this latency. Tsuneo |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| someone a FAQ please | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not sure whether FTDI translates to preferable at 921.6kBaud | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 921 kBaud to a PC running under Windows | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CTS latency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not just USB? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hardware handshake | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not convinced that HW is the (only) issue | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Poor quality | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hardware (firmware?) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Is FAQ entry working yet? | 01/01/70 00:00 |