| ??? 11/23/01 00:38 Read: times |
#16843 - RE: Keil comments - correction |
When I said,
"Which will obviously not compile." I was, of course, talking complete rubbish! Let's just take another look at that expansion, with syntax colouring: if( A > B ) return A; // A is biggest else return B; // B is biggestClearly this will compile (nested comments permitting), but is not quite what one might have expected from the original macro definition (the 'else' clause is missing - it's "disappeared" into the comment) |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Keil's 6.20c problem with comments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil\'s 6.20c problem with comments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil comments - correction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil, MSVC, BCB - consensus | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil\'s 6.20c problem with comments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil\'s 6.20c comments - Craig | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil, MSVC, BCB - consensus | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil, MSVC, BCB - consensus | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil\\\'s 6.20c problem with comments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil, MSVC, BCB - consensus | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil, MSVC, BCB - consensus | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Keil, MSVC, BCB - Peter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
First things first! | 01/01/70 00:00 |



