| ??? 09/07/09 00:25 Read: times |
#168761 - Yes, but not with the hardware increment Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Using the one-clocker's auto-increment eliminates the inc instruction, which speeds things up considerably, in addition to which it reduces the code-space consumption by nearly half. Further, the one-clocker can add some speed, if it is useful to do that. If it isn't, then the speed-power product can be reduced by slowing the clock down to 1/12 or maybe 1/10 the original rate.
RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Fastest way to fill buffer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| something like this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| when software hits limits... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| auto-increment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Two questions .. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But Gonzallo unrolled it already isn't it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, but not with the hardware increment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| be specific | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Don't forget about the Maxim/Dallas parts! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what to unroll | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Well, what you CAN do ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |