| ??? 11/24/01 06:51 Read: times |
#16879 - RE: 8052.com Chips Database |
Hello Craig
What I am missing in your list is number of portpins also I would like an comparison of the bigger ones like 535, 537, dallas or other in PLCC 68 ... standart 52 very often has not enough portpins. A possibility for users to send commends about the specific chip and bring in more info than in the datasheet thank you for a good idea of that database Peter Herbst |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 8052.com Chips Database | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052.com Chips Database | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052.com Chips Database | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052.com Chips Database | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052.com Chips Database | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052.com Chips Database | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052.com Chips Database | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052.com Chips Database | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Further info on Chips database | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Further info on Chips database | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Further info on Chips database | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052.com Chips Database | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8052.com Chips Database | 01/01/70 00:00 |



