| ??? 11/28/01 12:42 Read: times |
#17002 - RE: High Res. Incremental Optical Encoder |
Yes, Bruce it was me. I do not have the pulse chart and do not have the time to recreate it, but I think it is 2 in 16, not 1 in 15 that misses. In my previous posting in this tread I fell in the trap of suggesting uC inputs, seing his very low pulse rate. Even a 1 pulse per hour encoder interface must be capable of high speed. The situation is that the encoder may stop with the lamp and cell just across a transition line and even the most minute oscillation (we are talking gears) will create very rapid direction changes.
You must use the HP chip or a CPLD or accept occasional errors. Have fun, Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| High Res. Incremental Optical Encoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: High Res. Incremental Optical Encoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: High Res. Incremental Optical Encoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: High Res. Incremental Optical Encoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: High Res. Incremental Optical Encoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: High Res. Incremental Optical Encoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: High Res. Incremental Optical Encoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Truth Table for Optical Encoder | 01/01/70 00:00 |



