| ??? 11/10/09 10:58 Read: times |
#170632 - You need to make these things clear Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Elahe Naderi said:
it's 2 month i'm working in this project You had not mentioned that before. Remember: nobody knows anything at all about you or your project apart from what you explicitly state in your posts! I asked you if you had a specific reason for using a non-I2C chip when you require I2C, and you said, "no" - you didn't mention anything about being already comitted to this particular chip! and now we found that we need i2c bus Again, you didn't mention that this is a new requirement in an existing project. So, how tightly comitted are you to using this chip? Is there an opportunity to switch to a better-suited chip? just ans Answers can only be based on the information that you provide. You cannot get good answers if you don't provide good & complete information! But, if you cannot switch chips, you have your answer here: http://www.8052.com/forum/read/170624 |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| how 8051 without i2c bus connect to i2c bus? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| master or slave? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| slave or master | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bit-banged | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Search terms | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Choice of micro | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| micro without i2c | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But you specifically want I2C?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Jumping the gun? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thanks for ur ans | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What was the search criteria? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just ans | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What is the reason for I2C? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You need to make these things clear | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Classic I2Cbits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I2C_0.0.zip | 01/01/70 00:00 |