| ??? 12/22/09 07:20 Read: times |
#171844 - what is conclusion for OP? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
- is needed additional hardware ? (sample-hold, zero crossing?, otr both?).
In this( and any) case - 3 fixed freq , fixed waveform (sinewave) - problem is to select proper chips to make things. I'm still in doubt that this Aduc is matching part. If high precision is needed - expensive S/H will be needed. And this comes from selected Aduc -which is expensive too, and probably is aimed for different applications - high resolution sensors i think. regards |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| ADuC816 Problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sample rate ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Isn't that exactly what you should get? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Indeed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| average of the repetitive peak ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Clarification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Signal Frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| magnitude | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dump a number of samples to check | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it is possible? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| fast sample-and-hold | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sorry, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it won't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Undersampling often quite powerful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what is conclusion for OP? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How about precision rectification? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:ADUC816 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure, you can | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Most cheaper digital scopes uses repetitive sampling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how about | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SF=1 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Consistent not a simple subset of accurate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dumping Values | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| *EDIT* | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Circuit | 01/01/70 00:00 |