| ??? 02/05/10 20:48 Read: times |
#172930 - I (dis)agree Responding to: ???'s previous message |
One of the problems with solderless breadboards is that they are so fragile, i.e. the circuits built on them are easily disturbed
I agree Further, people using them seldom take the physical parameters of the breadboard, i.e. adjacent contact capacitance, resistance, inductance, etc. I agree, but disagree as to relevance for detecting a pushbutton Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Buttons - Hardware | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| do double check .... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Debouncing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Have you considered that it could simply be the "breadboard" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I (dis)agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Relevance to pushbuttons | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Consider the objective | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Agreed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that's why there's so fluid a definition for "working" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PCB's to match the contact arrangement on a "breadboard" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not exactly ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Solved: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Never discharge a cap directly by a switch! | 01/01/70 00:00 |