| ??? 02/19/10 16:50 Read: times |
#173294 - :re why not try Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jan Waclawek said:
Is the "special" stuff extensive? I'm not sure. I'm reading the new PDF manual (v2.9.0) which is leaps and bounds above most open-source project documentation. I just remember from looking at it earlier, and noted that there were syntax difference for the C-language extensions, like for port bits and such. It's probably a day of porting a project, and the good news is that the Silicon Labs folks like SDCC and support it. -a |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| state of SDCC for 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why don't you simply give it a try? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| :re why not try | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| get the newest version | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| should not be a big deal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Already done | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| my take | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the framework and implementations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: the framework | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| haven't, but: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I've used it | 01/01/70 00:00 |